OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stressed that taxpayers should not bail out companies that make bad business decisions|World Economic Forum|CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT, went into damage control after a public backlash over comments suggesting it might seek government help to finance its massive $1.4 trillion chip and data center investments.
How uproar began
The controversy began when CFO Sarah Friar implied that the US government could “backstop” OpenAI’s debt to lower financing costs. Critics argued this meant taxpayers would shoulder potential losses for a private firm valued at $500 billion.
Clarifications and reaction
Friar quickly clarified that OpenAI wasn’t seeking a federal guarantee but wanted government collaboration to boost AI infrastructure. Her comments, however, fueled wider debate about how the company plans to fund its huge expansion amid rising AI costs.
CEO Sam Altman later clarified that OpenAI isn’t seeking or expecting any government aid, while White House AI adviser David Sacks assured that taxpayers won’t fund AI bailouts.
The clarification comes amid growing market anxiety over massive AI investments.
Circular logic and deep links
Critics argue that OpenAI’s setup reflects “circular logic”—investing in and relying on the same companies it partners with, such as Nvidia, Microsoft, AMD, Oracle, and CoreWeave.
This interconnected network, analysts warn, mirrors the “too interconnected to fail” dynamic seen in the 2008 crisis, making the broader tech ecosystem vulnerable if AI valuations drop.
AI stocks have taken a hit this week, with Nvidia losing over 7% and erasing $400 billion in market value, while Palantir plunged 13%.
Altman acknowledged concerns about OpenAI’s $1.4 trillion commitments but expressed confidence in growth from enterprise AI, consumer devices, robotics, and scientific discovery.